According to some of the comments I received on my article yesterday, Gentrification Hits Home: My Rent Goes Up and the $8 Sundae at Salt & Straw, I AM the problem that I am facing – being priced out of my cute studio near Hawthorne. Because I chose to move to Portland seeking a walkable lifestyle, I am displacing native Oregonians.

I guess I should have just stayed in the apartment building in Maputo, Mozambique, the place where my family lived when I was born to avoid displacing other people. But if you go further back than that, I guess my family should never have moved to Africa from India in the first place to avoid displacing native Africans. All in all, I guess my ancestors should have stayed in the small region of Kutch in India to avoid displacing anyone.

The point I’m trying to illustrate here is that mobility is a fact of life and that displacement can’t be avoided by avoiding mobility. Just because you were born in a place doesn’t give you any more right to it than someone who wasn’t born there. The mentality of “only a certain kind of people have a right to live here, and that’s only people who were born here. Everyone else is a gentrifier” is a precursor to xenophobia, parochialism and racism. And besides, it could be argued that only Native Americans have a right to live in the US, as they were the original natives and that any other person, even if they are native Oregonians going back generations, is a gentrifier.

Harboring resentment at new people moving into your neighborhood is not the solution to gentrification. As Daniel Hertz points out in his article, “There’s Basically No Way Not to be a Gentrifier”, displacement of original residents is only half of the problem. The other half is that people who want to move into and live in certain neighborhoods are unable to. This is the half of the problem I’m experiencing. But in essence we are in the same boat – long time Portland residents and newcomers – we can’t live in the neighborhoods we want to live in. People who are priced out of moving into a neighborhood face the same injustice that people who’ve lived in a neighborhood for 50 or 60 years that are displaced. The root problem is the same – rising housing prices.

So instead of pitting “original residents” (who is really an original resident?) against new people coming in is futile, destructive and divisive. And it’s fighting the wrong war. The point is to be inclusive, not exclusive. The point is to make our neighborhoods and cities accessible to more people, not less, including people from other places and people who make less than the median income, whether they have always lived there or are just moving in. The point is to avoid economic, geographic, cultural segregation and promote integration. Let’s join hands in doing this instead of drawing a line in the sand and creating divides that don’t need to exist.

Photo Credit: Photo by Department of the Interior. National Park Service (II). Midwest Region. Scotts Bluffs National Monument. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Be Sociable, Share!
Tags: , , ,

3 Responses

  1. Steve Weiss says:

    I wonder how you can ask property owners whose tax burden rises as an area gains affluence to not increase rents. How will it add to the quality of life for the person who invested in the property to begin with to not follow local market rates? A altruistic benefit for the community? Sorry, but then you’re talking Beatrice Moore and frankly, there aren’t many of her anywhere.


    People flock to certain cities for their glittering and established norms that we in the sticks only dream of, but at some point the Disneyland ride demands an “E” ticket.

Post a Comment