Today’s post is by Kirby Hoyt:
Let’s face facts, cities are incomplete. They are never done. They’re either in a state of expansion, decline or repair. But they’re never complete. Phoenix is still developmentally infantile. At least you’d think that by studying the figure/ground relationship within its urban core. With all the recent discussions about “vacant” land, empty lots, and the like, you’d think Phoenix was some sort of ruin, a former urban battleground, with the remnants of the buildings swept away.
One problem with our mass of urban lacuna is the deadness they promote. Reminiscent of larger urban cities in the ‘70s such as New York, Chicago, and still today Detroit, Phoenix has yet to realize its full potential as a “city.” There are tremendous possibilities and with the right leadership (which we have at the City level but not the State), Phoenix can become an amazing place to live (I already think it is).
One theoretical movement that aims to suggest the latent potential of these spaces is the concept of appropriation, the thought that people can make a difference by their actions and interventions. I would agree that with the right idea and constant nurturing, appropriation of these spaces can make a difference. But the means and methods should be considered.
I posit there are three types of appropriation: Casual, formal, and guerilla. Casual appropriation is a method of activating space not by ownership, but by use; a temporal urbanism that potentially authors a parcel of land but leaves no traces and does no harm. Like kids playing a game of baseball in an empty lot and then picking up their bases and going home at the end of the day for dinner. No harm no foul.
Formal appropriation, as I see it, deals with actual ownership, authorship, and some sort of use. This is an area which is lacking downtown due to the nature of land banking and real estate speculation. Unless owners activate their land and allow some use to occur, it just sits idle. Some might even say this is an example of blight.
The last method I give is guerilla appropriation, wherein there is no ownership by the group, but there is authorship through intervention and/or actions, and by use. This is becoming a popular means of activating and appropriating space. One such concept is guerilla gardening, where artists and activists look to appropriate public and private spaces by creating landscape interventions, whether plants, sculptures, or performances. Typically the interventions are not harmful, yet add interest to the daily existence of these spaces while creating ephemeral patches in the urban fabric.
There are pros and cons through guerilla actions: On the one hand, they generate discussions of how our city can be improved while adding an artistic element to the urban realm. On the other hand, we should always be mindful of the rights of the property owners. I propose we work with the property owners, city officials, and activists to combine efforts to find ways of adding value (social value, artistic value, and economic value) through interventions and activities.
Several cities have created ephemeral art projects in the past that have drawn thousands of tourists, such as Denver’s Cow Parade in 2006 where 83 fiberglass cows, each painted by a difference artist, were placed at various points around the city. Phoenix once hosted GuitarMania in 2005 and placed more than 80 larger-than-life Fender Stratocasters (again painted by artists and celebrities) around the city. What if these lots became temporary works of art?
What if there was an annual celebration that coincided with the opening of multiple works of art throughout the city on these empty parcels? How about a festival to be held each spring coalescing art, music, food, film, performances, and a sense of renewal in the name Phoenix? This could be the next Burning Man, right in the middle of Phoenix. Who’s with me?
Personally I see art as a catalyst for our urban psychotherapy, in order to get out of what some would call a state of hyper-inferiority when gauged against other cities. Phoenix needs to take advantage of one of the one thing it has that many older cities don’t – great weather in the winter. We should be celebrating it, showing it off as much as possible, and hosting thousands of visitors that want to be here when it’s snowing back home. And a great to do that is by creating a celebration that exposes the potential of this future desert city.
Let’s put our minds and energies together and create some positive ideas that can be implemented and make a difference right in our own backyard.
Photo credit: An artist’s intervention – The Gates – in Central Park by Christo. Photo courtesy of the author.Tags: empty lot revitalization, kirby hoyt, phoenix, urban appropriation
I just discovered your blog and enjoyed reading about your renovation.
I am trying to find a photo of how your concrete floors turned out in your Red Mountain home because, it sounds like you were going to just clean them and clear coat them.
I have three rooms with original colored concrete that are in pretty good shape except for tack marks from carpet, but the rest of the house looks a lot like your living room with the ghost marks of ceramic tile. (Phx home 1946)
Hi SJ, our floor turned out to look very industrial. Email me at email@example.com and I can send you some photographs.
Thank you! I will.
the cows, guitars and christo were all on public land. big diff than private. you understand that. but the potential for legal issues on private land is just so huge and a very large negative drawback. we are in a lawsuit happy country. US has more lawyers per capita than any other country in the world. Japan has the fewest. as a private land owner, i would be very very hesitate to have open access other than to cross an empty lot, as you most often see. and more likely to put up a cheap fence, as you see also. otherwise, it’s just an accident waiting to happen. Christo’s project was also engineered, and cost hundred’s of thousands $. organizing large events, even the guitars, took lots of time, glad you have the energy to lead it. county on hundreds of hours of your time. i’ve been doing guerrilla art/landscape stuff since the late 70’s in Baltimore, Anchorage, San Francisco, Tempe. the idea has been to start discussion, by pointing out certain things, seeing if a subtle nudge germinates into some kind of action, typically municipal, usually not. I have never been interested in getting fame or applause from that activity. (my first degree was fine art) also as a painter, i do appreciate graffiti art, but i also sympathize with the owners of buildings and walls that have been tagged without their permission. even if the graffiti has some artistic merit. it’s still an illegal aggressive act against another person.
and using language such as ‘hyper-inferiority’ just re-enforces perceptions. I grew up in Phx/Tempe and it was a very nice place to grow up. the education was at least adequate, sometimes excellent, but not comparing it to anywhere else. and the place has a place to it. living anywhere near a butte or mountain is pretty special. climbing on them as a kid, was wonderful. hyperbolic language is for polemics (or tea party types), not for discussions. i’m a city walker and cyclist, when it’s safe to ride, but not on the large streets. a friend was very seriously injured recently riding his bicycle and getting cut-off by a driver at an intersection. there’s a lot of issues to resolve in that area, mostly people ones, not physical.